Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 04:38

What’s next?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
FAA will restrict flights at Newark airport through end of year - NJ.com
Thank you.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Solar Storms Are Pushing Elon Musk’s Satellites Back to Earth - Gizmodo
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Why do narcissists and especially covert narcissists always play the victim?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Physicists Propose Cheaper Alternative to Particle Colliders: Supermassive Black Holes - Gizmodo
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Uh-Oh! Switch 2's New GameChat Feature Is Transcribing Bad Words - Nintendo Life
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Replace Your Gmail Password Now, Google Tells 2 Billion Users - Forbes
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Jurors in Harvey Weinstein trial reportedly fighting among themselves - BBC
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.